village-center-Saint-Paul-Community

Headline news

Saturday 7 th December 2024
 


One of the “mottos” of Advent, one of the phrases that captures the spirit of this time that we began last Sunday, is “Come, Lord Jesus,” taken from the end of the Book of Revelation (Rev 22:20). It is, we could say, one of the most appropriate prayers of Advent.
 
And yet, it is important to make sure that we understand these words correctly. Because they are not a request, nor a demand that we address to Jesus so that he decides to come to us, as if he, for some reason, was hesitant and we had to convince him to actually come to the world.
 
“Come, Lord Jesus” is a request addressed to ourselves: a prayer in which we ask to gather the wisdom and the strength to open the doors of our lives to him and remove all the obstacles that we sometimes put in the way, blocking his way. Obstacles that we put because, in reality, we are afraid of his coming.
 
And why, we should ask ourselves, are we afraid of Jesus? Why do we resist Jesus' coming (even if we keep repeating "Come, come...")?
 
One possible answer is that we know, or we sense, that in one way or another Jesus always comes to unsettle us. He comes to give us a little push, to urge us to go further in our generosity, to abandon the routines that numb our conscience, and to make an exodus, outside the comfort that binds us and the territories that we already know, towards the risky life of the Gospel. That is why deep down, perhaps unconsciously, we fear Jesus' coming.
 
It would be good to identify the attitudes that tend to tie us into a desperate search for comfort. Review them, understand that they impoverish us and reject them. Then we will be able to say with all sincerity and vigor, in this Advent and always: "COME, LORD JESUS!"


 

Wednesday 16 th October 2024
 


This short writing is a personal reflection on the person of Mary, looking in the gospel for an answer to the question: What was Mary like? What does the Gospel really tell me about Mary? Extracting from the gospels all the quotes that speak of Mary, I have learned a lot about her; I could even draw up a “profile” with her personal characteristics. But, just as it happened to Mary, as I will explain below, looking for the answer to this question, I have found something I was not looking for. I have realized that Mary is not a static, immutable character, but she evolves and changes as a mother and as a woman.

There is a key that connects the occasions in which Mary searches for her son every time she loses him. In this loss-search lies the change in Mary. Each time this happens (on three occasions), it’s a blow for Mary that makes her reflect, meditate, and change, in such a way that in the end she is able to find Jesus. Let's see.

Mary's first “lost - seek - find”
Lk 2:41-46: As a teenager, Jesus decides to stay in the Temple to listen to and talk with the doctors of the law, instead of returning to his parents. They were already on their way home and realize that they lost him, so they return to the temple. When they find him, Mary, like a good mother, rebukes Jesus who was already giving some clues.
She loses Jesus as a child, dependent on his parents, and finds him as an adolescent with an air of independence. She stops being a protective mother and becomes a mother who must exercise her authority (Lk 2:50-51b) so that the adolescent does not get lost again.

Mary's second “lost - seek - find”
Mk 3:31-32 (Mt 12:46-50; Lk 8:19-21): Mary and Jesus' brothers and sisters are looking for him and find him preaching to the crowd. And what do they find? A Jesus who loves them more for being his sheep than for being family. Once again, Mary was looking for her son, and she finds a shepherd. She goes from being a mother to being a disciple. She loses Jesus the son, and finds Jesus the teacher. From this moment on, the evangelists no longer refer to her as his mother.

Third “loss - search - find” of Mary
Jn 19,25-27: “Then Jesus, seeing his mother, and his beloved disciple standing next to her, said to his mother: “Woman, look at your son.” Then he said to the disciple: “Look at your mother.” Mary loses the shepherd and finds herself a seed of the Kingdom of God. Jesus charges both of them (the disciple and the woman) to continue the announcement of the Kingdom, welcoming each other. The fraternal love that has been created among Jesus' followers knows no kinship or blood. The Kingdom of God is built with the love that Jesus has given us, which is to care for and serve one another.

The angel Gabriel appears to Mary to tell her that she will conceive a son by the power of the Holy Spirit. On the cross, this angel is Jesus himself, who tells her that she must continue forward in building the Kingdom of God.

These three instances of Mary losing- searching- finding, reflect not only a process of Mary’s self-understanding and that of her son, but also a process that we may encounter in our own lives, a process of discovery and re-discovery about who we are, what our mission is, and how our relationships and our understanding of others keep changing our lives.


 

Thursday 29 th August 2024
 


Today, August 29, the Church remembers the martyrdom of John the Baptist. I have always thought that the story that Mark tells us in the sixth chapter of his Gospel (Mk 6:17-29) functions as a parenthesis within the general narrative to describe the worst aspects of the world in which Jesus wants to announce his good news. In the scene, full of details, there is betrayal, hatred, violence, manipulation, vanity, cowardice. In other words, everything that stands against the hopeful message of the prophet of Nazareth. The terrible death of the Baptist is like a warning: Beware! The evangelist tells us: this is the landscape facing Jesus... and all of us.
 
The most disturbing character in the story is the young dancer—the girl who, without intending to, finds herself at the center of the action. Mark does not name her (he simply presents her as "the daughter of Herodias"). It is Flavius ​​Josephus, in his Antiquities of the Jews, who tells us that the little girl was called Salome (book XVIII, chapter 5,4).
 
Salome is disturbing because she is innocent and yet becomes the necessary instrument to bring about John's death.
 
Herodias, her mother, appears as someone without scruples, full of hatred and evil intentions, who from the beginning wants to eliminate the Baptist. She is, so to speak, "the villain," a character without nuances, almost a caricature. Her daughter, on the other hand, is a young woman without bad intentions who simply obeys what she is told: to dance for the king. And, once she has danced and Herod, dazzled, has promised her that he will give her whatever she asks for ("even if it is half my kingdom," he swears foolishly), she runs to ask Herodias what she should ask for. When her mother tells her to ask for John's head, the girl, without thinking twice, instead of refusing to participate in the tragedy, returns to the king and asks for the prophet's life.
 
None of us are Herodias, but we can all become Salome. That is the reason for the uneasiness that this young character should cause us. We are not perverse like the mother, but we can all, at times, be naive and frivolous like the daughter. Then we could allow ourselves to be manipulated by dark forces that overwhelm us and we could end up being instruments that favor the cause of evil.
 
Salome is a warning: she cautions us against the danger of falling into superficiality, of sinning by being naive.
 
The point, of course, is not that we should become distrustful of everyone in an unhealthy manner. The point is that we should never fall into naiveté. When we ignore the power of the hatred that dwells in some people, then it is possible that this hatred may end up taking advantage of our blindness.
 
We must avoid being like Herodias, but that is not the difficult part. What is truly hard is never to be like Salome either.
 

 

Tuesday 14 th May 2024
 
The ancient city of Philippi, today

During the Easter season—which we will conclude this coming Sunday with the great feast of Pentecost—, at Mass we have been reading the book of the Acts of the Apostles. Every year, when we engage in this exercise of reading continuously the second volume of Luke’s story, one is amazed at the depth, the narrative richness, and the wisdom of this account. Today I would simply like to focus on a scene that we find in chapter 16: the conversion of the Philippian jailer.
 
Let us remember the episode: Paul and Silas are in northern Greece, in the city of Philippi, «the main Roman colony in the district of Macedonia» (16:12). There, Paul expels an evil spirit from a slave who, with her talents for fortune-telling, until that moment had brought great profits to her masters. These, «seeing that all hope of earning money was gone» (16:19), accuse Paul and Silas of altering the city’s peace. Consequently, the magistrates order that the two Hebrews be flogged. After receiving many lashes, they are sent to prison. The jailer is asked to keep a close eye on them.
 
At night, an earthquake shakes the foundations of the prison, opening up its doors. The jailer, assuming that the prisoners have used the opportunity to escape, is about to commit suicide when Paul, from his cell, warns him that no one has escaped. The man, stupefied, throws himself at the feet of Paul and Silas and asks them how he can be saved. Then they proclaim the Gospel to him. Immediately afterwards—and this is what we wanted to underline—, the jailer takes them with him, washes their wounds and is baptized along with his family (16:33). Before being baptized, he cleans the wounds of Paul and Silas. These are the same wounds they had when they entered the prison, the result of the beating they received before being entrusted to the jailer. These are the wounds he completely ignored when hours before he hastily locked them up. Those wounds to which he did not give the slightest importance then, now touch him. Even more: now they are an emergency. The priority is to wash the wounds; then he can be baptized.
 
The way the jailer looks at Paul and Silas’ wounds is important. What was invisible before his change of heart—the bruises, the open flesh, the blood—later becomes essential. Perhaps this good man (dedicated to a profession as hard and dehumanizing as that of locking up criminals), draws with his own process an itinerary in which we can all see ourselves reflected. It is also an itinerary that establishes an infallible criterion to evaluate our degree of understanding of the Gospel. Probably, all of us can recognize ourselves in the jailer when we think of those times when other people’s wounds seemed invisible. All of us can think of instances in which God manifested himself to us precisely through wounded people. And perhaps we can remember with joy those moments when the wounds of others moved us, and we wanted to do something to heal them.
 
In the jailer’s journey we discover the fundamental criterion that distinguishes a person who lives the Gospel from a person who does not: the second is indifferent to the wounds of others. The first, on the other hand, does everything he can to alleviate the pain of those who suffer. The converted jailer, eager to follow Jesus, does not fall on his knees, overcome with piety, and praise God with half-closed eyes, nor does he run to the temple to offer a sacrifice, nor does he lose himself in complicated theological sermons: he rolls up his sleeves and cleans the wounds of his brothers.
 
The extent to which the wounds of others move us or not will always indicate, with surprising precision, the quality of our faith.


 

Friday 10 th May 2024

In the context of Mothers' Day, which we will celebrate this coming Sunday, we offer the following meditation.

 


I am not a mother, but I know how much pressure we put on mothers, as we usually point to them for their son’s and daughter’s success and, above all, failures. A mother’s love is instinctive which doesn’t mean necessarily that it comes from the heart, but, quite the opposite, it’s ingrained, and sort of imposed by their genes. A mother’s love, including, of course, adopting parents, is hardly chosen. It is the feeling of ultimate responsibility for their children regardless of their actions. Mothers are not always models of kindness and tenderness, but unless prevented by some health and mental illness, mothers embrace their children’s joys, and suffering and pains as those of their own.

In today’s wars and conflicts, thinking about mothers helps me to get some perspective beyond ideological or political views.

I think about the suffering of Ukrainian mothers as they see their sons and daughters being sent to war to defend their land, and (emphatic “and” here), I think about the mothers of the Russian soldiers also sent to kill and be killed in a war that they may not fully understand.

And I think about the mothers of those killed or held hostage by Hamas just because they were in the wrong place at the wrong time, and I feel equally for the mothers of all the Palestinians killed in the spree of violence (many who were mothers themselves.)

I refuse to make sense of explanations about political calculations, nationalistic motivations, historical legitimacies. And I refuse to rationalize about lesser evils or proportionate response. I choose to dwell in the suffering of all the mothers (and the fathers, and sisters and brothers and grandparents…). It makes it less simple than taking sides, but more human, less soothing but more empathetic.

I have sympathy for Russian mothers, and Ukrainian, and Israelis, and Palestinian mothers. Of course, I do have an opinion about some of these conflicts. But my reasoning, my ideological view, my political persuasion (that I undoubtedly have) will not make me feel that the death of a human being, the death of somebody’s mother or father, is politically necessary, morally deserved or justified.

No matter what side you are on, no matter what your ideological persuasion and what reasons you have for it; If we fail to feel the suffering of a mother in Ukraine, in Russia, in Israel, Palestine, or any mother and father who loose their children, if we fail to empathize with them, if indeed, we fail to empathize with any pain and suffering, our humanity will have surrendered and succumbed, to the world of ideas and politics. Thus, we will have turned our hearts into stones.

 

RSS news feed

Blog archives









Contact

1505 Howard Street
Racine, WI 53404, USA
racine@comsp.org
Tel.: +1-262-634-2666

Mexico City, MEXICO
mexico@comsp.org
Tel.: +52-555-335-0602

Azua, DOMINICAN REPUBLIC
azua@comsp.org
Tel. 1: +1-809-521-2902
Tel. 2: +1-809-521-1019

Cochabamba, BOLIVIA
cochabamba@comsp.org
Tel.: +591-4-4352253

Bogota, COLOMBIA
bogota@comsp.org
Tel.: +57-1-6349172

Meki, ETHIOPIA
meki@comsp.org
Tel.: +251-932508188